Date: 2010-02-01 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolf-nd-shadows.livejournal.com
WBBC makes money off its protests by provoking people into confrontations with them. They use their rhetoric to incite people into some form of violence, or into someway compromising their "freedom of speech" and then they sue the person.
The protest in San Francisco gets them lots of attention, and a really big possibility of them offending someone into making a compromising move.

Date: 2010-02-01 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holly-evolving.livejournal.com
It looks like a good time was had by all counter-protesters. WBC didn't even show up to their second planned location.

Date: 2010-02-01 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolf-nd-shadows.livejournal.com
yeah, that is happening a lot. People know about what they do, and what works against them. They lasted only 15 minutes against the rutgers community.
My favorite part of the Rutgers protest is that the church they were supposed to stands in front proactively covered itself in rainbow flags that said "God is Love" which forced WBBC to walk half a block away from their intended target.

Date: 2010-02-02 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holly-evolving.livejournal.com
I was pretty impressed with the Rutgers counter-protest. It looks like it happened on a grander scale than the SF Twitter, too. Theirs was just funnier.

I'm a big fan of using a wall of happy people to keep them out, instead of just asking them to leave.

Profile

holly_evolving: (Default)
holly_evolving

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 09:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios