However, bonus points for donating ALL the money to a worthy cause

[holly_evolving]

Maybe it's just me...

I definitely think that Al Gore deserves recognition for the hard work he's done to promote awareness and understanding of global warning. He's gone to a lot of places and participated in a lot of research. He's spoken very eloquently on the topic. I suppose he's been the ambassador for global warming in the 21st century.

But the Nobel Peace Prize? How does being a harpy for a serious, dangerous issue that anyone with half a brain already knows about make him a world peace worker? He's not the first, the best, or the brightest, just the most prolific. And even that's arguable.

Eventually, the global climate threats will cause drastic depletions in the world's resources, which will likely cause serious conflicts worldwide. And if Gore had, oh, I don't know, accomplished something to prevent those conflicts, or undo some of the damage done, I could see the logic.

But help me out here, cause I don't get how being an (albeit justified) alarmist equates to a Peace Prize Laureate.

Comments

[holly-evolving.livejournal.com]

I think it would have made more sense to create a new category for Environmental Protection or something similar, and award that. It's been how long since there was a new category added?

I think that the Peace Prize should be awarded for work that prevents or solves conflict, and I don't think that he has done either of those things. That doesn't mean that I don't think he should be recognized at all, just that I think this particular recognition is misplaced.